↓ Skip to main content

An anthropological emic‐etic perspective on open access practices

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Documentation, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
An anthropological emic‐etic perspective on open access practices
Published in
Journal of Documentation, January 2011
DOI 10.1108/00220411111105461
Authors

Jingfeng Xia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
France 1 1%
India 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 84 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 24%
Librarian 17 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 44 48%
Computer Science 13 14%
Arts and Humanities 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 8 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Documentation
#234
of 644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,775
of 193,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Documentation
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.